Tuesday, 24 March 2015

Pre Raphaelite research

We were briefed to emulate a painting or photograph produced by the Pre Raphaelite collective.

I began researching the pre raphaelites at the Manchester art Gallery, here I got a view of their great works portraying the 19th century the way it actually was, a stark movement at the time. The most notable painting I saw was entitled Work Painting by Ford Madox Brown, although it would be too resource intensive for me to replicate it gave me a good feel for their work, steeped in metaphors and hidden meaning.



I went on to research more of the collectives work on the internet, using various websites and search engines to discover more of their paintings and hopefully find a piece of work I would like to emulate that ins't too resource intensive. One of the first images that caught my eye was a historical painting of Lady Godiva by John Collier

Lady Godiva was a noblewoman from the 11th century who rode the streets of coventry in protest of her husbands oppressive tax on his tenants. John Collier portrayed her as a young and graceful woman, with her head down, perhaps from the traditional victorian perspective that it's a shameful thing to be naked. The grand background and mighty horse mixed with the soft morning light and heir of grace and gentleness in her posture however definitely give her the feeling of a heroin.

I thought deeply about wether I could reproduce this image in a modern setting and tried to think of metaphors to surround the image for a modern interpretation. However, I found none to do the image justice and continued to search for other paintings whilst still bearing this one in mind.

I found several technically basic portraits produced by the pre raphaelites, including: Sophy Gray by Millais, various works of Jane Morris by Rossetti and a portrait of Cecily Horner by Edward Burne Jones, (all images found and downloaded from Wiki Art)



However, none of these images really inspired me, so I searched for a painting with a little with a little more of a meaning or story behind the image.














I continued my search by looking for any historical or mythical paintings produced by the brother hood using wiki art to search for the categories of each individual painter. I first stumbled across Cinderella by John Everett Millais and felt as if I had found something I could relate to. However, the images itself struck my as quite boring and flat, so i decided to continue looking as i would rather emulate something a little more passionate.












Finally I found Pandora By Rossetti, here was an image I could relate too, was colourful and enjoyable to look at it ( in my opinion) and was also technically a viable option which could be produced with a small budget.

I have chosen my painting to emulate and am currently looking for models and MUA's etc to help me with the production of a final image.

Joseph Rigby 

www.josephrigbyphotography.co.uk 

Using a Range of Media

Evidence of using different media and evidence of importing images from multiple sources. 








The above 2 images are scanned rubbings of various textures i found around the college, the one on the left is a rubbing of a perferated wall mounted file holder whilst the rubbing on the right is of a mac keyboard.  I then scanned the rubbings into the computer. 

    

The above 2 images are natural materials i found outside of the college and then scanned into a computer. My medium being real life !


The Two images above are evidence of me working with printed images which I photographed and imported from my mobile phone. 


 The Three images below are images I produced on the white infinity product background with my DSLR camera, I imported the images from an SD memory card.

Adjusting an image for optimum appearance

 Adjust images for optimal appearance 

St Pancras Hotel

To the left is the original out-of-camera HDR JPEG. Below is the adjusted image, I used photoshop to make the adjustments.

I began by retrieving the 3 raw images used to create the HDR and re-merged them in photoshops built in plugin: HDR pro. I desaturated the whole image to almost 0, added a blue filter and re-saturated the light streaks created by the long exposures. Finally I rotated the image so the hotel was more horizontal.

Monday, 16 March 2015

Pre Raphaelite Research

Research for my Pre Raphaelite Project

I began my project to emulate and re-interpret a painting or photograph by the pre raphaelite brotherhood by first searching for examples of their work:

 I then, by clicking on an image of John Everett Millais, found a website called wiki art:


Here I found a list of all of the members of the Pre Raphaelite Brotherhood along with selections of their artwork. I browsed through much of their work, I found several of their literary artworks such as Cinderella by John Everett Millais and Historical paintings such as Lady Godiva by John Collier along with researching the stories behind the images on wikipedia. 








After researching many photographs I decided to emulate the painting: Pandora by Dante Gabriella Rosseti.
To be sure of my choice I withdrew a book from the library, the book was called "pre raphaelite paintings" Here i found several works i liked along with their related history / meaning. My eye was particularly drawn to Opheilia, 

However, I decided it was probably too difficult to replicate due to the location and unique look of the subject. 

 I am currently looking for other creatives (models MUA's) to work with on the reproduction of the painting.

 

Joseph Rigby




Monday, 2 February 2015

Lossy Vs Lossless Compression

Lossy Vs Lossless compression

Lossless compression is a way of compressing images that doesn’t remove any of the original data. This method of compression takes up much more memory than lossy compression, however, the loss of detail and information in digital images or any other file type are much less i.e. the quality of the image or file will remain equally as high as before the file was compressed.  

Any file formats such as Raw, or CR2 (canon format for raw files) etc are all exmaples of files that benefit from lossless compression.

Lossy compression is a memory efficient way of storing images and other file types. This is because when lossy compression takes place data and information from the file being compressed is deleted so as to reduce it’s memory uptake. Usually, information will be deleted in a way that is noticeable to any future user of this file.

For example, file formats such as Jpegs, png and gif are all compressed with lossy compression.


When you are simply looking at a jpeg image it will be difficult to notice the difference between that and it’s counterpart raw image. However, when you come to edit the image the lack of information in the jpeg image will be noticeable.

:) I hope you enjoy 

another hilarious tutorial brought to you by: www.josephrigbyphotography.co.uk.

Image copyright laws on the web

How does intellectual property and copyright laws apply to images being used on the Internet

Which images do copyright laws apply to?

Copyright laws on the web apply to any digital images taken on any digital capturing device or any images taken on a traditional film camera that have been scanned into a digital form. Copyright also applies to any illustration or animations that are present on the Internet.

However, some of the copyright laws and guidelines do only apply to photographic images

How long does copyright last?

Copyright laws exist on any image until the creator dies, plus 70 years after the calendar year of their death.

Who owns the copyright?

Generally, the owner of the copyrights to an image is the creator or creators’ of an image. However, if the creation of an image was commissioned on behalf of an organization it is not uncommon for the organization in question to own the rights to the image, rather than the creator of an image.  Also, the creator of an image may pass on the selling rights of an image to an agency.

What if you cannot find the person or party who owns the copyrights to an image?

Work in where the owner of copyright isn’t known, the copyrights to the image don’t simply just disappear. These works in question are called orphan works; if orphan works are used or copied this is still an infringement of copyright. If an image doesn’t come attached with a © symbol, copyright laws still apply.

Is their anyway I can be completely safe when using an image from the Internet?

The only way to be completely safe when reproducing an image is to retrieve the copyright from the owner of an image. Or, to retrieve an image from a website which states clearly in the terms and conditions that the image may be used and copied freely.

What are the consequences of copyright infringement?

Often the theft of an image can result in being forced to pay the usage rights for an image when the theft has been discovered. However, it can result in being taken to court and having to pay for the usage rights, the legal fees of both you and the copyright holder, along with having to take the image down from your website as well.

However, deliberate infringement of copyright on a commercial scale is against the law and can result in a criminal prosecution.


Basic introduction to copyright law of images used on the world wide web, for more information visit: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/305165/c-notice-201401.pdf

Monday, 19 January 2015

Bitmaps Vs Vectors

Yay, this is fun. This is one of the topics that I believe most people get involved in photography for.

Bitmaps are exciting, bitmaps are like images, shapes or graphics made up of pixels, thousands or millions of pixels, imagine that. Millions of tiny little blocks all working together for the bigger picture.

But their not just little blocks you see, they have little personalities, little aversions and preferences. You see if you stretch a bitmap image all of the edges start to pixelate and look like a stair case. Some people generalise and call them bad names and berate bitmaps for being bastards when they stair case, but they don't understand that their just all working together to make the image look bad, it's like a little cry for help. Why can't you just accept us for who we are ? why do we need to change ? remind you of anyone ? Their all working together so you just let them be. Amazing isn't it, their just stretched too thin very easily. However, even though their hard to work with they have amazing advantages, photographs are essentially bitmap images. If you convert a photograph to a vector it just looks like a cartoon. But bitmaps, although they're hard to work with they definitely come with their advantages. Working with bitmaps is a bit like being Clint Eastwood's boss in Dirty Harry. You don't like the way they don't toe the line and follow all the orders but goddam your glad you've got them.

Vectors, when working with a graphic or shapes are without doubt the better format to work with. Vectors aren't made up of pixels, they're essentially made up of lines and mathematical equations allowing you to stretch them infinitely without ever losing quality. They are like people without emotions, you can stretch them to the limit. Their file sizes are smaller too, although they do take up more processing power. Have you ever seen despicable me ? the villain called vector? Vector graphics have essentially absolutely nothing to do with him, other than the fact he's good at maths.

However, a big drawback to vectors is that you can't use them in photoshop, they sort of just convert to a bitmap image and are made up of pixels all of a sudden. Vectors are really only used for designing graphics, logos, leaflets, websites and the like. Bitmaps on the other hand aren't very useful in this area because they aren't as flexible.

The important distinction to make here is that anything thats created with pixels is a bitmap, things like jpegs, gifs, bmp's. Common file formats for vectors are xml's, eps's, svg's, essentially all kinds of weird formats that, if you are a photographer at least, you hope never to see in your life. I guess, it's kind of like driving a car and hoping never to see a cyclist. I mean their there and your glad that they exist in the world, compensating for all of the things you, as a driver aren't currently doing, but you just hope not to see them because they kind of might get in your way. I do however, even as a driver like to see cyclists. It refreshes me, I like that people cycle and are doing good for themselves and the world. I kind of like to remove the boundaries between me and everything else and live in kind of a subtle and blissful oneness of it all, where there is little distinction between you, yourself and the cyclist over their in the rain, it's kind of like we're all in this together ? you know ? I'm driving because I have a young daughter and most of the time have too but at the same time the cyclist doesn't and instead of just sitting on his back, she's using that opportunity to better the world and them-self whilst just living out there in nature you know ? their stoicism inspires me, even though I can remind myself I do the same thing on a run sometimes, in the wind and the lashing rain I still feel their stoicism you know ? it still feels good to me ? I guess I was just trying to create a metaphor from the general perspective to help you understand, because I care about you too ? you know ? However, still as a photographer, I hope never to see an SVG file. Do you understand ?

So there you have it, Vectors Vs Bitmaps.

Vectors are based on Mathematical equations and so don’t alter or show pixels when you stretch them or zoom in. (vector data) 

Use more processing power than bitmaps
Made up from lines equations and calculations 
Individual elements can be grouped 
images are more precise than bitmaps
take up less memory than bitmaps

take up less storage than bitmaps

Bitmaps are of a specific size and don’t stretch well, they also show “stair case edges” when you zoom in. (raster data)

Use less processing power than vectors